Going With the Stream

Media in the Online Age

The Guardian has revealed plans for several UK broadcasters are in talks to create a UK streaming service to combat Netflix and Amazon.

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 08.05.24.pngClick to read. 

This is further evidence we can use in our exam to prove how far traditional or ‘slow media’ will go to fight to remain on top. But Netflix shows to sign of slowing down, in fact Netflix have announced they intend to invest $1billion into European original content alone and that’s just for 20108. Read more at CNET

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 08.10.22.png

In terms of the music industry, Spotify have revealed that just because a song is old does not mean it’s not making money. They have published the most streamed songs of the 70s, 80s and 90s and some of them are still being streamed in the millions. Read more at the BBC.

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 08.12.40.png

This article offers us evidence of the positive effect of Anderson’s Long Tail Theory. 

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 08.16.12.png

Advertisements

Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: Here’s what you need to know

Media in the Online Age

Social and Participatory Media is big news at the moment due to the Cambridge Analytica and Facebook data breach. Clearly, this is terrific news for students of Media in the Online Age and luckily for us the lovely folks over at The Next Web have put this detailed article in place to help us make sense of it. Click here or the image below.  What you must then do is consider the wider implications for Facebook and the way in which consumers use Facebook and Social Media in general.

Screen Shot 2018-03-25 at 17.11.15.png

Now go and read the article at The Verge.

Screen Shot 2018-03-25 at 17.18.11.png

NME to close print edition after 66 years

After 66 years the iconic music magazine is to close. This is a magazine I have very fond memories of and spent many hours reading it and scouring the pages looking for David Byrne and Talking Heads references!

If an iconic magazine like this can close then what does it say for the rest of the print and magazine industry? We have here further evidence that the print industry is in decline and more evidence that Andrew Keen is right.

Click the picture below to read the full Guardian article:

Screen Shot 2018-03-07 at 17.26.13.png

Also, you should check out this article from Alexis Petridis, also from The Guardian.

Click the image.

Screen Shot 2018-03-07 at 17.37.06

The Internet Is Not the Answer – podcast with Andrew Keen

Here is a 40 minute podcast with author and critic Andrew Keen talking about the values of the Internet. Click the image below.

Screen Shot 2018-03-06 at 09.55.43

Social Media is the New Smoking

In The Guardian yesterday, Sean Parker, one of the founders of Facebook, has said that they knew they were creating something which could explore the “…vulnerability in human psychology”, when they were constructing how to make Facebook more appealing.

Screen Shot 2017-11-10 at 11.20.49

Parker goes on to say how they exploited customers by using a ‘dopamine effect’. According to Science News for Students:

Dopamine also helps with reinforcement — motivating an animal to do something again and again. Dopamine is what prompts a lab animal, for instance, to repeatedly press a lever to get tasty pellets of food. And it’s part of why humans seek out another slice of pizza. Reward and reinforcement help us learn where to find important things such as food or water, so that we can go back for more. Dopamine even affects moods. Things that are rewarding tend to make us feel pretty good.

And Psychology Today said in in 2012:

Of course, sad stories or trying moments are shared too, but the goal there is to get viewers to secrete oxytocin, the “love hormone,” and elicit their help. Feeling supported during times of crisis helps mitigate the pain caused by the release of cortisol, the stress hormone. Facebook fools our brain into believing that loved ones surround us, which historically was essential to our survival. The human brain, because it evolved thousands of years before photography, fails on many levels to recognize the difference between pictures and people.

The Guardian goes on to say:

He explained that when Facebook was being developed the objective was: “How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?” It was this mindset that led to the creation of features such as the “like” button that would give users “a little dopamine hit” to encourage them to upload more content.

“It’s a social-validation feedback loop … exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology.”

But what does all this mean for media students? Consider Parker’s quote of, “How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?” It’s clear that the primary function of Facebook is business facing but that shouldn’t be a surprise to us. It’s the strange place of ‘cognitive dissonance’ in which we find ourselves. We know Facebook and other social media companies are based on an economic model and that they have no real obligation to make our lives better yet we somehow choose to forget all that and jump head first into the abyss. There are many reports of how social media is harmful to our mental health and yet we keep scrolling by, keep double-tapping for love and retweeting that hilarious meme.

It’s almost as if social media is the new smoking. We know it’s bad for our health but we choose not to think about it. We choose instead to keep puffing away, willingly harming our self-esteem, attention span and understanding of the world around us. Got a light?

New York Times Says Newspapers Still Relevant

News Media

In a recent article in the New York Times it is suggested that the print press are still relevant, despite falling circulation. In fact, they go as far to say that ‘Brexit’ was largely down to the influence of British tabloids. Read the full article below.

Screen Shot 2017-05-05 at 07.36.09

This is a great piece of research which argues against the notion that online media is replacing ‘old’ or ‘slow’ media.

Cats on a Treadmill

Media in the Online Age

Facebook and online media in general often claims that thanks to the World Wide Web we are connecting with each other and making greater communities. However, more and more research is suggesting that in fact the opposite is happening. Companies like Facebook are actually atomising society and encouraging an ‘Echo Chamber’ effect on our fundamental ideas, values and beliefs.

In a recent article on Tech Crunch, Jon Evans argues that

At Facebook’s scale, behavioral targeting doesn’t just reflect our behavior, it actually influences it. Over time, a service which was supposed to connect humanity is actually partitioning us into fractal disconnected bubbles.

Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 09.12.22

Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 09.13.32.png

A New Statesman article outlines how the Echo Chamber is linked to the recent decision for Britain to leave the European Union:

Social networks – and echo chambers specifically – might be partly to blame. A study carried out last year, entitled “The spreading of misinformation online”, revealed their concerning effects. According to Michela del Vicario, a co-author of the study, echo chambers are “closed environments, inside of which users are not reached by contrasting information”.

And The Independent even claim that social media Echo Chambers are in part to blame for the rise of Donald Trump’s success in the United States of America:

Instead of trying to reach out and understand why people felt moved to vote for Trump, too many admonished them. We retreated to our echo chambers, where we bellow our opinions at people who are already in agreement and enjoy having them repeated back to us. Our prismatic view of public opinion through tailored social media feeds not only hid from us the confused, angry people we needed to try and reason with, but it gave us a warped view of their motives. And this is where it gets particularly scary: Trump voters are fully aware he is sexist and xenophobic, they just don’t care.

But what is the answer? Should we all leave Facebook and the Internet for good?

Andrew Keen argues that the Internet is a failed experiment. That the promise of the World Wide Web has not been fulfilled. So, perhaps we shouldn’t abandon it completely but if research is telling us that social media like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are actually bad for our mental health then surely we should no longer use them?

We can argue that the Internet (and by extension your own social media) is like a mirror. If an idiot looks into it then it is an idiot who peers back. If you redesign how you use social media and the Internet then things can change. One of the most difficult things to accomplish is to navigate through the noise of the Internet. To look past the bigotry, the lies, the fake news and even the cats on a treadmill. To look past all that and to seek out only what makes us better is more  difficult than we think and this, I would argue, is because when it really comes to it, deep down, we don’t care.

It appears that Neil Postman was right when he wrote in his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death:

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.

Amusing-Ourselves-To-Death4

And so there it is.

As Adam Curtis says, Oh Dear.